Convert WordPress to static site generator Pelican

Pelican

After a number of years using WordPress as blogging software, I converted the site to a static site generator: Pelican.

Pelican converts reStructuredText into static HTML. No more PHP, no more databases, but straight static HTML.

The process of converting the site was relatively painless. The conversion tool did a great job of converting an XML export of WordPress into reStructuredText pages.

What needed (and still needs) some manual care were/are the code blocks (the biggest reason of the move from WordPress to Pelican) in articles, and the escaping of variables. WordPress gets pretty complex once you're trying to use it for code snippets and console outputs. The reStructuredText is much more flexible and allows you to edit the site using any text editor. There are tools to do that with WordPress and its API, but it always felt like a difficult workaround.

I thought about keeping the URLs as-is: Over the years the number of visitors of the site has steadily risen, as has the level of indexing by search engines. You don't want dead links - but on the other hand, a transition to another content management system would be the perfect moment to 'clean up' the category …

more ...


zsh shell inside Emacs on Windows

Configuring Emacs (on Windows) to use the zsh shell can be tricky, especially when you use ( oh my zsh) plugins or fancy prompts. Emacs sets an environment variable when running a shell, which can be used to selectively disable plugins and change prompts. Configuring the SSH client and server to set and accept that variable makes ssh-ing inside Emacs to remote servers possible as well.

more ...

The complexity of securing Docker versus Vagrant

Docker versus Vagrant

There are many, many comparisons out there on the Internet of Docker versus Vagrant. Usability, scalability, portability, you-name-it-ability.

This blogpost is about some different security aspects about the current implementation of Docker versus Vagrant. It's a high, high-level comparison of the security impact for the host system.

Can you compare the two ? Not really, they're being used for completely different reasons. Docker is wildly popular for medium to large scale production webserver deployments and microservices, where each service has its own process, or container. Vagrant is more being used during design and development by individual developers, or in teams at companies.

So, having said that, let's compare the security differences in high-level:

Docker

  • Partial isolation from the host
  • Shares the kernel with the host.
  • Resources aren't guaranteed, they're shared.
  • Uses runC/libcontainer as runtime (before version 1.8 it used linux containers (lxc) under the hood, then libcontainer, and since the inception of the Open Container Initiative it uses runC which abstracts even further away from libcontainer). System resources can be allocated using control groups (cgroups): block devices (blkio), CPU (cpu), CPU accounting (cpuacct), individual CPU and memory nodes (cpuset), devices, task management (freezer), memory usage (memory), network packets (net_cls …
more ...

Security through obscurity means better operational security

Are YOU OPSEC ?
What I personally like so much about being a penetration tester, is that (I'd like to think that) we make the world a safer place. Better security means better privacy means more democracy.
It's not about telling people what "they" did wrong. On the contrary, it's a learning process for all of us. No single application, network or system is the same. Each company has its own risk model, which means that there often is no one-size-fits-all solution.

It's about "how can we improve the security" for everybody. That's why I think it's so important that penetration testers should lead by example. Apply proper operation security procedures themselves.

Recently my first Pluralsight course was published, operational security for penetration testers. It deals with what opsec is, and how to apply it to your penetration testing workflow. The trailer of the course can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSF6XbCxYGY. The course itself can be found on Pluralsight's site, https://www.pluralsight.com/courses/opsec-penetration-testers

As beautifully stated by the third law of OPSEC: "If you are not protecting it, the adversary wins".

more ...

Use Emacs to create OAuth 2.0 UML sequence diagrams

OAuth 2.0 abstract protocol flow

It seems that the OAuth 2.0 framework is more and more being used by web (and mobile) applications. Great !

Although the protocol itself is not that complex, there are a number of different use-cases, flows and implementations to choose from. As with most things in life, the devil is in the detail.

When reviewing OAuth 2.0 implementations or writing penetration testing reports I like to draw UML diagrams. That makes it easier to understand what's going on, and to spot potential issues. After all, a picture is worth a thousand words.

This can be done extremely easy using the GPL-licensed open source Emacs editor, in conjunction with the GPL-licensed open source tool PlantUML (and optionally using Eclipse Public Licensed Graphviz).

Emacs is worlds' most versatile editor. In this case, it's being used to edit the text, and automatically convert the text to an image. PlantUML is a tool which allows you to write UML in human readable text and does the actual conversion. Graphviz is visualization software, and optionally - in this case, it's used to show certain images.

Download the compiled PlantUML jar file, Emacs and optionally download and install Graphviz.

Once you have Emacs installed and running …

more ...

It's about the journey: Compiling 64-bit Unison / GTK2 on Windows

Unison File Synchronizer

The excellent MSYS2 (mingw64 and mingw32) subsytem makes compiling native Windows compilations "as easy as compilation can be". However, as with everything in life, sometimes when trying to do one thing (compile a program), you end up chasing other vaguely related issues (one exotic compile error after another).

For synchronizing files between servers and workstations I use the open source GPLv3 licensed Unison File Synchronizer [1]. Although the text interface version of Unison compiles straight-out-of-the box on mingw64, the GTK2 interface proved to be a bit more cumbersome.

To compile Unison with the GTK2 interface, lablgtk [2] is needed, an OCaml interface to GTK.

So, the journey began with firing up a shell in a fresh mingw64 environment, and installing the build prerequisites:

pacman -Sy --noconfirm base-devel git \
mingw-w64-x86_64-{glib2,gtk2,ocaml,pango,toolchain}

After downloading the latest source (2.18.5 [3]) and trying to compile it (using make ) after running

./configure --prefix=/mingw64 --disable-gtktest

the first error message is shown:

mingw64/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkwin32.h:40:36: fatal error: gdk/win32/gdkwin32keys.h: No such file or directory

It seems that GTK2 version 2.24.31 contains an error [4], and incorrectly still references the file …

more ...

Why Sharing Improves Us

why sharing improves us

If you're a perfectionist, it's difficult to release a product: Whether that's source code, a pentest report or a blogpost. It's always a work in progress, and never finished.

That's why I like open sourcing code for example, releasing it for everybody to see. Knowing beforehand that the code, your work will be read by others (while you're working on it) forces you to think longer, deeper and harder about the variable names, the structures, function names and coding styles.

I'm the lead pentester for a company where we allow the customer to peek over our shoulder while we're working. The customer can see everything that we try, do and find out during the pentest. This improves the relationship with the customer, as s/he sees what we're doing and even can think along with us.

It also improves the customer satisfaction, as they know exactly what they're getting. And, it improves the mutual respect. Instead of becoming a classical us-versus-them pentest (the pentesters versus the developers), it becomes a 'let's improve the overall security together' exercise.

According to all the positive feedback we're receiving, we're onto something here. A win-win.

Sunlight is not only a great disinfectant, it's also …

more ...

Verify security vulnerabilities: A collection of Bash one-liners

security test one-liners
There's manual pentesting and writing reports, and there is blindly copying the output of automated scantools. I am fortunate enough to write and review a lot of pentest reports, as well as read pentest reports of a other companies.
Nothing looks as bad as "vulnerabilities" in a report that haven't been verified as such. This really degrades the quality of the report.

Below is a number of simple one-liners that can help with verifying vulnerabilities. All examples can be run in a basic shell (Bash, zsh), where the TARGET variable contains the hostname of the target that needs to be verified (without protocol).

SSL/TLS: BREACH

for compression in compress deflate exi gzip identity pack200-gzip br
bzip2 lzma peerdist sdch xpress xz; do curl -ksI -H "Accept-Encoding:
$compression" https://$TARGET \| grep -i "content-encoding:
$compression"; done
*Might* be vulnerable when: one or more compression methods are shown.

SSL/TLS: Client-Initiated Secure Renegotiation

echo "R\nQ" | timeout 10 openssl s_client -connect ${TARGET}:443
Vulnerable when: Renegotiation is successful (exit code == 0)

HTTP: TRACE enabled

for proto in http https; do echo testing ${proto}://${TARGET};
curl -qskIX TRACE ${proto}://${TARGET}\|grep -i TRACE; done;
Vulnerable when: the verb TRACE is shown

HTTP: Open …

more ...

Zen provisioning: Bootstrap the installation of Ansible using Vagrant

zen

I'm a big fan of the DevOps attitude of "cattle" versus "pets": machines should be built in a repeatable, automated and consistent way. If there's something wrong, don't be afraid to replace a sick "cow" instead of trying to revive your "pet".

This Zen mindset also helps when preparing for demos, trainings and workshops: Usually I need a number of machines, and what better way than create them by using automation ? For that I'm using the tools Ansible, Packer, Vagrant and VirtualBox - they are all Open Source and can be used on a number of platforms (e.g. Windows, Linux and Mac OS X).

Ansible is a tool for managing systems and deploying applications, licensed under the GNU General Public License version 3 (my personal favorite).

Vagrant is a tool for managing virtual machines and is licensed under the MIT license.

VirtualBox is a virtualization environment for local use, licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2.

Packer creates a machine image by installing an operating system to a multitude of local and cloud platforms, for example VMWare, VirtualBox as well as Docker, Amazon EC2 and DigitalOcean. Packer is licensed under the Mozilla Public License Version 2.0.

How …

more ...